CELPIP Writing and Speaking Scoring Criteria: What It Takes to Reach Level 9
Aiming for CLB 9? PrepEx’s guide shows how CELPIP raters score Writing and Speaking at every level and what separates a level 8 response from a 9. Check sample answers against level 9, then get your own graded free.
CELPIP rates Writing and Speaking on four dimensions: Content/Coherence, Vocabulary, Readability (Listenability in Speaking) and Task Fulfillment, each with four factors. Grammar sits inside Readability or Listenability, and word count inside Task Fulfillment.
Raters work independently and give a level for every dimension: three to five raters per Speaking performance, four to six per Writing performance. The result is a CELPIP level, which from 3 up is the same number on the CLB scale. CELPIP’s FAQ calls its Writing scoring an “AI-human hybrid”, with every Writing score checked by its rating team. Weighting isn’t published. For levels, raw scores and pass marks, see how CELPIP is scored.
The four dimensions in Writing and Speaking
Writing
Content/Coherence
Are the ideas developed, supported and in a sensible order?
Factors raters weigh
How many ideas there are
How good the ideas are
How the ideas are organized
Examples and supporting detail
Check first
A purpose or position clear in the first lines
A specific detail behind each main idea
One main idea per paragraph
Vocabulary
How wide is the vocabulary, and does it sound natural?
Factors raters weigh
Choosing the right word
Words that fit the situation
Variety of words and phrases
Exactness and accuracy
Check first
Specific words instead of vague ones like good or thing
Little wording lifted from the prompt
Context-specific terms used correctly, not forced in
Readability
How easy is the response to read?
Factors raters weigh
Layout and paragraph breaks
Linking words and transitions
Grammar and sentence structure
Spelling and punctuation
Check first
A new paragraph for each new idea
Varied transitions, not one connector on repeat
Complex sentences with errors that don’t slow the reader
Task Fulfillment
Did it do what the task asked, in a tone that suits the reader?
Factors raters weigh
Relevance to the task
Covering every part
Tone
Word count (about 150–200)
Check first
Every bullet answered, and an option chosen in Task 2
A tone that fits the reader: polite to a manager, warmer to a neighbour
A length at or near 150–200 words
Speaking
Content/Coherence
Are the ideas developed, supported and easy to follow?
Factors raters weigh
How many ideas there are
How good the ideas are
How the ideas are organized
Examples and supporting detail
Check first
A direct answer near the start
Reasons with examples, not a bare list
Clear signposting between ideas
Vocabulary
How wide is the vocabulary, and does it sound natural spoken aloud?
Factors raters weigh
Choosing the right word
Words that fit the situation
Variety of words and phrases
Exactness and accuracy
Check first
Precise words for the situation
Idioms or casual expressions where the task is casual
No rare words dropped in to impress
Listenability
How easy is the response to follow by ear?
Factors raters weigh
Rhythm, pronunciation and intonation
Pauses, fillers and self-corrections
Grammar and sentence structure
Variety of sentence types
Check first
A steady pace at normal volume
Few long pauses or restarts
Some complex sentences that stay clear
Task Fulfillment
Did the speaker answer the task, use the time and pick a suitable tone?
Factors raters weigh
Staying on the task
Covering every part
Tone for the listener
Length: using the time
Check first
Every part of the task answered
A tone that suits the person the task names
The main point made early, and most of the time used
CELPIP levels 12 to 3, dimension by dimension
Each row is PrepEx’s own summary of CELPIP’s published level descriptors. For CELPIP’s own wording, open the official score comparison chart.
Writing
CELPIP Writing levels by dimension (PrepEx paraphrase)
Level
Content/Coherence
Vocabulary
Readability
Task Fulfillment
12Expert
Complex texts for any purpose; every idea fully developed with enough relevant support.
Specialized, formal and everyday words that say exactly what is meant.
Smooth links inside and across paragraphs; a very wide range of complex structures, very well controlled.
Tone and style fit exactly; ideas come across precisely, even to unknown readers.
11Advanced
Formal or informal texts for varied purposes; ideas developed with relevant support.
Specialized, formal and everyday words, a little less exact than at 12.
Smooth links inside and across paragraphs; a broad range of complex structures, well controlled.
Tone and style usually right; ideas come across accurately.
10Highly effective
Short texts with some complexity; key ideas backed by a wide spread of facts or detail.
Precise wording for detail, description and comparison.
Ideas linked inside and across paragraphs; varied complex structures under good control.
Handles most formal and informal conventions; meaning comes through as intended.
9Effective
Short texts with some complexity (first line same as 10); key ideas backed by relevant facts or detail.
Accurate wording for detail, description and comparison.
Well-organized paragraphs (same line as 8); varied complex structures under control; good spelling and punctuation.
Handles some formal and most informal conventions for a defined reader; meaning comes through.
8Good
Short, moderately complex texts; a main idea developed with supporting detail.
Everyday or context-specific words that carry the meaning.
Well-organized paragraphs; good control of complex grammar, spelling and punctuation.
Follows common conventions; main ideas stated and supported.
7Adequate
Short, moderately complex, mostly factual texts; one main idea, supported with detail.
Everyday words plus some context-specific ones.
Related ideas grouped into paragraphs; adequate control of complex grammar, good control of the basics.
Follows most common conventions; factual information gets across.
6Developing
Short, coherent texts; a main idea with some support.
Everyday words and phrases.
Related ideas grouped into paragraphs; good simple grammar; adequate spelling and punctuation.
Tone and style suit the situation only some of the time; some facts get across.
5Acquiring
Short texts, from simple to moderately complex; a main idea plus a few related ones.
Everyday words and phrases.
Joins two or more related ideas; good simple grammar; adequate mechanics.
Set phrases that suit the situation; some information on familiar topics.
4Adequate for daily life
Simple sentences and brief paragraphs about personal matters.
Common words.
Some control of simple grammar; capitals and basic punctuation.
A few suitable set phrases; some information on very familiar topics.
3 and belowSome proficiency or less
Short, simple sentences at 3; very short phrases below that.
Very common words; at the bottom, letters and numbers.
Grammar correct some of the time at 3, rarely below it.
Basic information about the writer.
Speaking
CELPIP Speaking levels by dimension (PrepEx paraphrase)
Level
Content/Coherence
Vocabulary
Listenability
Task Fulfillment
12Expert
Demanding, unfamiliar situations for any purpose; complex, clear, exact detail.
Concrete and abstract language over a very wide range; many idioms and figures of speech.
A very wide range of complex structures, very well controlled; fluent throughout.
Adapts language to the situation, purpose and listener; communicates precisely.
11Advanced
Demanding, unfamiliar situations for varied purposes; clear, exact description or detail.
A broad concrete and abstract range; a range of idioms.
A broad range of complex structures, well controlled; fluent throughout.
Adapts to most situations and listeners; ideas come across.
10Highly effective
Moderately demanding situations the speaker hasn’t met before; clear descriptions or reasons.
Concrete and abstract language across a range; some idioms.
Good control across a broad range of complex structures; mostly fluent (fluency line same as 8 and 9).
Adjusts style and tone for a broad range of listeners and situations.
9Effective
Gives information and supports ideas with reasons of moderate complexity.
Everyday and context-specific vocabulary together; some idioms.
Some control of complex structures and mostly fluent, worded exactly as at 8.
Adjusts style and tone for a range of listeners, people in authority included.
8Good
Concrete and some abstract information, backed by moderately complex reasons (identical to 7).
Common words with some context-specific vocabulary; some idioms.
Some control of complex structures; mostly fluent; very few restarts or badly placed pauses.
Adjusts style and tone for some listeners and situations; intended meaning comes through.
7Adequate
Worded exactly as at 8.
Common words plus some more exact ones; some idioms.
Good control of simple structures; clear rather than fluent; very few restarts.
Adjusts to familiar listeners and situations; intended meaning comes through.
6Developing
Reasons for opinions and feelings; relates facts.
Common words and phrases.
Controls simple structures; usually understandable; some restarts, repeats or pauses.
Adjusts style for some familiar situations; information is accurate.
5Acquiring
Feelings and preferences; describes familiar things and people; a simple personal story.
Common words and phrases.
Some control of simple structures.
Information on a familiar topic, casual or somewhat formal.
4Adequate for daily life
Likes, dislikes and feelings; simple descriptions; a short, simple story.
Common words.
Limited control of simple structures.
Some information on a very familiar topic.
3 and belowSome proficiency or less
Likes, dislikes and needs; below 3, only some of the time.
Very common words.
Grammar correct some of the time at 3, rarely below it.
Talks about themselves and their needs.
What moves a response up a level
Writing
6 → 7
The tone settles. CELPIP’s analysis of its Level 6 samples describes writing that swings between essay-like and too casual; at 7 it mostly fits the task. Word choice gets more specific and accurate. Complex sentences appear with adequate control, and spelling and punctuation improve to good. Level 7 samples still have errors throughout, but the ideas stay clear.
7 → 8
The response stops reporting facts and develops a main idea with support. CELPIP’s Level 8 analysis points to more complex ideas, sharper details that repeat less, and tighter wording. Paragraphs go from grouped to well organized, and complex grammar from adequate to good control. Level 8 samples still contain quite a few errors; they just don’t block understanding.
8 → 9
The boundary that matters most for CLB 9. The paragraph line is identical at both levels, so look at complexity that holds up throughout, accurate rather than everyday words, a range of complex structures and some formal conventions. The Writing Pro: Target 9+ Study Pack shows a Task 2 response held at 8 despite strong grammar: no purpose statement, conclusion or paragraph breaks, repeated words, a harsh tone in places, and no option chosen. Our reading: organization, task completion and precision decide 8 versus 9 more often than grammar does.
9 → 10
Support widens from relevant to wide-ranging, and word choice from accurate to precise. The writer links ideas inside and across paragraphs, controls complex structures well and handles most formal conventions, not some. CELPIP’s Level 10 analysis credits concise, varied vocabulary, comparisons, conditional and subjunctive structures, and politeness carried by modal verbs. The study pack’s Level 10 Task 2 still opens with an idea that drifts off topic.
Speaking
6 → 7
Reasons get more developed and some abstract information appears. Simple grammar comes under good control, delivery goes from usually understandable to clear, and restarts and awkward pauses drop to very few. CELPIP’s Level 6 analysis notes pauses and pronunciation that sometimes get in the way.
7 → 8
Content/Coherence can’t separate them: CELPIP uses the same line for both. Vocabulary shifts toward context-specific terms, grammar moves from good control of simple structures to some control of complex ones, delivery goes from clear to mostly fluent, and tone adjusts beyond familiar listeners. CELPIP’s Level 8 analysis credits work-related terms, a complex conditional sentence and a firm but friendly tone.
8 → 9
The descriptors barely change, and Listenability’s grammar and fluency lines are identical. What changes is a fuller mix of everyday and context-specific vocabulary, and tone that adjusts for a range of listeners, people in authority included. CELPIP’s analysis says the Level 9 speaker extends answers with fewer pauses. The Speaking Pro: Target 9+ Study Pack pairs an 8 and a 9 for all eight tasks. The 8s tend to leave some ideas thin, repeat basic linking words and let fillers or restarts break the flow; the 9s have more detail and precise phrasing, though word choice still slips.
9 → 10
Grammar control rises from some to good, across a broad range of complex structures; the fluency wording stays the same. Vocabulary widens to concrete and abstract language, and the speaker copes with moderately demanding situations they haven’t met before. CELPIP’s Level 10 analysis highlights comparing an unusual object with familiar ones so the listener can picture it, natural idioms, and intonation that carries attitude.
Where CELPIP describes two levels the same way
At a few boundaries, CELPIP’s descriptors use the same words for two neighbouring levels. That line can’t tell you which level a response is, so decide on the dimensions that do change.
Identical wording at neighbouring CELPIP levels
Skill and dimension
Levels
What is identical
Decide it on
Speaking, Content/Coherence
7 and 8
The whole cell
The other three dimensions
Speaking, Listenability
8 and 9
The grammar and fluency lines
Vocabulary, tone, and how long answers run without pauses
The descriptors describe a typical test taker, so a real response can be stronger in one dimension, weaker in another and land on the same level. They aren’t the whole rubric either: raters use an unpublished scale with five performance levels per dimension. The current versions are CELPIP’s May 2026 Level Descriptors PDF and its Score Comparison Chart, with two rated responses and an analysis per level. Search results still surface 2019 and 2020 study packs; the October 2026 Target 9+ packs replace them.
How CELPIP Writing and Speaking are marked
Each Speaking performance, meaning all eight responses, gets three to five raters. Each Writing performance, both tasks, gets four to six. Those numbers come from CELPIP’s test results page. A 2021 CELPIP podcast described two raters per Writing task plus a benchmark rater when they disagree. That fits four to six, but CELPIP doesn’t spell out the arithmetic.
Independent and blind. Tests are assigned at random online. Raters can’t see each other’s ratings, your name, your other scores or the level you need. A Writing rater sees one task only.
A benchmark rater for disagreements. If the ratings don’t agree, an experienced benchmark rater who hasn’t seen them rates the performance.
A level per dimension, from evidence. CELPIP converts those ratings into a CELPIP level with rules set by language experts.
The whole response. Raters don’t count errors, and one impressive word doesn’t lift a score.
No accent category. CELPIP staff have called the test “accent agnostic” (Official CELPIP Podcast #2). An accent matters only if it makes something unclear.
Re-evaluation never lowers a score, and raters aren’t pushed to mark low.
Is CELPIP Writing checked by AI?
Partly. CELPIP’s FAQ calls its Writing scoring an “AI-human hybrid”: AI working alongside its human panel, with the rating team reviewing and verifying every Writing score. The FAQ says nothing about AI in Speaking, and the results page, Score Guide and Performance Standards don’t mention AI. Many prep pages and search summaries still say CELPIP uses no AI. For Writing, CELPIP’s own FAQ says otherwise. It doesn’t say when the system started or how the work is split.
What CELPIP doesn’t publish
Whether the four dimensions count equally, or how the tasks are weighted. For Speaking, CELPIP says each of the eight responses is rated on all four dimensions, so there are many ways to reach the same level. Any percentage split you see online is a guess.
The CLB 9 check: what level 9 shows in each dimension
Many Canada-bound test takers need CLB 7 and aim for CLB 9, which earns more Express Entry points. So the useful question is does this reach 9?, asked one dimension at a time. Here is what a Level 9 response shows, from CELPIP’s descriptors, Level 9 profiles and Target 9+ study packs, and what usually holds a Level 8 back.
What a level 9 response shows, and what usually keeps a level 8 response short
Dimension
Level 9 shows
What holds level 8 back
Content/Coherence
Ideas with some complexity throughout, each key point backed by a relevant detail; in Speaking, reasons with plenty of detail.
No clear purpose or conclusion, vague or repeated details, and ideas listed rather than developed.
Vocabulary
Accurate, specific words for details and comparisons; in Speaking, a natural mix of everyday and context-specific words.
One word used again and again, wording copied from the prompt, and near-miss word choices.
Readability (Writing)
Clear paragraphs, a range of complex sentences, infrequent errors that don’t slow the reader, and fewer punctuation slips than at 8.
One block of text, too few transitions, and punctuation errors that add up. Grammar alone is rarely the issue.
Listenability (Speaking)
The same grammar and fluency wording as 8, so it shows in delivery: longer stretches without long pauses, and errors that rarely get in the way.
Fillers and restarts that break the flow, the same basic linking words over and over, and mostly simple sentences.
Task Fulfillment
Every part answered, a clear choice where one is asked for, and a tone that suits the reader or listener.
No option chosen, a harsh or too casual tone, an idea that drifts off topic, or Writing far outside 150–200 words.
CLB 9 CHECK
Check two emails against level 9
Read a PrepEx sample, decide for each dimension whether it reaches level 9, then reveal PrepEx’s reference marks and the evidence behind them. The samples are PrepEx’s own, not CELPIP responses, and the marks are practice estimates, not official levels. If you disagree, go back to the evidence.
You signed up for a ten-week evening pottery course at your local community centre. In the third week, the kiln (the special oven used to harden finished pieces) stopped working. It has not been repaired, and the class has not been told when it will be. Only four classes are left.
Write an email of about 150–200 words to Mr. Lavoie, the program coordinator at the community centre. In your email:
• describe what has happened in the course so far
• explain why this situation is a problem for you
• say what you would like the centre to do
27 minutes, about 150–200 words
Email A
192 words
Dear Mr. Lavoie,
I am writing about the Tuesday evening pottery course at the community centre. I registered this course in September because I always wanted to learn how to make bowls and cups.
The first two weeks were good. Teacher is very patient and we learned how to use the wheel. But since third week the kiln is broken. We still make new pieces every class but nobody can fire them, so now the shelf is full of unfinished pieces. Also nobody told us when it will be repaired.
This is a problem for me because I wanted to give some pieces to my family as Christmas gifts. The teacher said the pieces can crack if they wait too long without firing. Only four classes are left, I am worried I will finish the course with nothing to bring home.
Honestly, it is not fair that we paid full price for half a course. I would like the centre to fix the kiln quickly or use the kiln in another centre. If it is not possible, please give us partial refund or some extra classes in January.
Thank you,
Hyun-woo Park
Your marks and PrepEx’s reference
Dimension
You
PrepEx
Result
PrepEx estimate · about level 7 overall
Estimated level in each dimension, with the evidence
Dimension
Level
Why
Content/Coherence
7
All three bullet points are answered in order with factual details: what went wrong ("since third week the kiln is broken"), why it matters ("Christmas gifts", "the pieces can crack") and what the writer wants. Each point gets only a short statement or two, and the last paragraph lists four options (fix it, another centre, refund, extra classes) without explaining any of them. That reads as a factual Level 7 email; for 8, the main ideas would need more specific, less repetitive support.
Vocabulary
7
Everyday words carry the email, with a few context-specific ones ("kiln", "fire them", "the wheel", "partial refund"). Word choice is repetitive ("pieces" and "course" four times each, "nobody" twice), and "registered this course" is missing "for". Meaning is never in doubt, but a Level 8 writer would say the same things more precisely and concisely.
Readability
7
Ideas are grouped into sensible paragraphs, and most simple sentences are correct. Errors run through the whole email: missing articles ("Teacher is very patient", "since third week", "give us partial refund"), tense ("the kiln is broken", "when it will be repaired") and a comma splice ("Only four classes are left, I am worried..."). None of them block meaning, which fits adequate rather than good control of complex grammar; Level 8 would need fewer and less noticeable errors.
Task Fulfillment
7
The email covers every bullet, stays within the word range, and opens and closes suitably. The tone mostly fits a formal request, but "Honestly, it is not fair that we paid full price for half a course" sounds blunt for a coordinator the writer needs help from. One slip like this keeps Task Fulfillment at about 7; a polite, formal tone held all the way through would support a higher level.
What would raise it: We'd put this at about Level 7 overall. Adding one specific detail to each bullet (for example, why another centre's kiln would be a workable option) is the change most likely to lift it to 8.
You covered everything the task asked; now give each point one more specific detail and keep the tone polite all the way through.
The task pages give one AI grade a day with no account, shared across Writing and Speaking. Levels are PrepEx practice estimates, not official CELPIP results.
Email B
197 words
Dear Mr. Lavoie,
I am writing about the Thursday evening beginner pottery course, which I joined this fall. I have enjoyed the classes so far, but the broken kiln has become a real concern for me and many of my classmates.
Since the third week, we have continued to make new pieces with no way of firing them. As a result, about thirty unfired bowls and mugs are now sitting on two shelves, and several have already cracked. Our instructor has been very understanding, however she has not been told when the repair will happen.
For me, glazing and firing were the parts of the course I was most looking forward. With only four classes remaining, it seems unlikely that I will achieve even one finished piece.
I would therefore like to ask whether the centre could arrange for our work to be fired elsewhere, for example at a local studio. If this is not possible, two extra sessions after the last class would allow us to complete the course. I would also appreciate if the class could receive a short update once a repair date is known.
Thank you for considering these options.
Sincerely,
Amira Haddad
Your marks and PrepEx’s reference
Dimension
You
PrepEx
Result
PrepEx estimate · about level 9 overall
Estimated level in each dimension, with the evidence
Dimension
Level
Why
Content/Coherence
9
Each key idea is backed with relevant detail: the size of the problem ("about thirty unfired bowls and mugs", "several have already cracked"), the instructor's position, two workable alternatives and a request for updates. The email moves logically from problem to effect to options, with some complexity. It stops short of 10 because the personal-impact paragraph rests on a single idea and the suggestions skip practical points such as cost or transport, so the support is relevant rather than wide-ranging.
Vocabulary
9
Word choice is accurate and fits the situation ("unfired", "glazing and firing", "arrange for our work to be fired"). Some wording is still general ("a real concern", "very understanding", "the parts of the course"), "achieve even one finished piece" is an awkward pairing, and "course" recurs. Accurate but not consistently precise vocabulary points to 9 rather than 10.
Readability
9
Paragraphs are well organized, each with one main idea, and transitions such as "As a result", "therefore" and "If this is not possible" guide the reader. The writer handles several kinds of complex sentence (a relative clause, "with no way of firing them", "for our work to be fired", "it seems unlikely that"). Errors are infrequent and minor: "however" joins two sentences with only a comma, "looking forward" is missing "to", and "appreciate if" needs "it". Their impact is minimal, which fits 9; Level 10 would show firmer control across a wider range.
Task Fulfillment
10
All three tasks are covered in order, with a clear purpose statement at the start and a courteous closing. The tone stays formal and polite throughout, softened by modal verbs ("could arrange", "would allow", "would also appreciate"), and the writer raises a complaint without blaming anyone. We'd put Task Fulfillment a level above the other dimensions; it isn't higher because the requests, though polite, aren't framed with the precision of the top levels (nothing on who would arrange the studio or by when).
What would raise it: We'd put this at about Level 9 overall. Making the suggestions more specific, for example who would pay for outside firing and when the extra sessions could run, is the change most likely to lift Content and Vocabulary towards 10.
This is a clear, polite, well-organized email; to get past 9, make your suggestions and word choices more specific.
The task pages give one AI grade a day with no account, shared across Writing and Speaking. Levels are PrepEx practice estimates, not official CELPIP results.
Responses are original PrepEx material written for this guide. Levels are PrepEx practice estimates against CELPIP’s public descriptors. CELPIP says its rating process cannot be reproduced outside the test, so treat them as a guide, not a prediction.
CLB 9 CHECK
Check a Speaking answer against level 9
Now a Speaking answer to Task 1, Giving Advice. Read the transcript, decide whether each dimension reaches level 9, then compare with PrepEx’s estimate. CELPIP’s raters work from the recording, never a transcript, so pace and pronunciation can’t be judged here and Listenability is a partial call.
Your older sister, Leila, has been renting an apartment downtown for three years. Her landlord is raising the rent next month. Your parents have offered to let her move back home for a year so she can save money to buy her own place. Leila can't decide what to do. Give her advice about whether she should move back in with your parents.
Preparation 30 seconds, speaking 90 seconds
Response A
Transcript · about 205 words
Hi Leila. So I heard about the rent going up — that's really frustrating. Um, honestly, I think you should take Mom and Dad's offer, but only if you set some rules first. (pause) So, first, the money. Right now you pay — you're paying almost half of your salary for that apartment, right? If you live at home for one year, you could save maybe fifteen thousand dollars, and that's a big part of a down payment. Also, your lease is finishing, so you don't have to sign for another year. (pause) But I know what you're worried about. You like your independence, and Mom can be, uh, a little bit too involved sometimes. So my advice is, talk with them before you move. Decide together about things like, um, if you pay something for groceries, and if they will ask where you go every night. If everybody agrees from the beginning, it will be much easier. And another thing is the commute. From their house it's like forty minutes to your office by train, so (pause) so try the trip one or two times before you decide. Overall, it's only one year, and after that you could buy your own place instead of paying rent forever, which is—
Your marks and PrepEx’s reference
Dimension
You
PrepEx
Result
PrepEx estimate · between levels 8 and 9 overall
Estimated level in each dimension, with the evidence
Dimension
Level
Why
Content/Coherence
9
The advice is well developed and built around Leila's real situation: the money ("almost half of your salary", "a big part of a down payment"), the timing of her lease, her worry about independence with a concrete plan ("Decide together" on groceries and questions about evenings out), and the commute, with a practical test before she commits. Each consideration comes with a reason tied to her feelings or her budget, which supports an estimate of 9. It isn't 10 because the commute point is thinner than the others and the last point is cut off before it lands.
Vocabulary
8
Most of the language is common and everyday ("a big part of", "much easier", "a little bit too involved"), with a few context-specific words used correctly ("down payment", "lease", "commute", "groceries"). Some phrasing is imprecise: "your lease is finishing" for ending, "try the trip one or two times", "things like". This is one of the two dimensions holding the response below 9, where everyday and context-specific words would work together more consistently instead of a few specific terms on a mostly general base.
Listenability
8
From a transcript we can judge grammar, sentence variety and the visible breaks in flow; we can't judge pronunciation, rhythm, intonation, volume or how long each pause really lasts, so this estimate could move once the audio is heard. On the page, simple structures are controlled and some complex ones work ("If you live at home for one year, you could save..."), with a few slips ("if you pay something for groceries" for whether you'd contribute). Restarts and repeats ("you pay — you're paying", "so (pause) so"), fillers and a string of basic transitions ("So, first", "Also", "And another thing") make it stop-start in places. That keeps Listenability at about 8 alongside Vocabulary; a Level 9 response would carry its ideas with fewer of these interruptions.
Task Fulfillment
9
The response does what the task asks: a clear recommendation with conditions, spoken directly to Leila in a tone that is warm but serious about a big decision ("I know what you're worried about"). It uses nearly all the time and is cut off mid-sentence ("which is—"). Some of CELPIP's own published samples at Levels 8, 9 and 12 were also cut off, so we don't treat this as a major fault, but the closing idea is lost. That supports about 9; a 10 would need more finely judged tone and style than one friendly, fairly informal register can show.
What would raise it: We'd put this between Level 8 and Level 9 overall: Vocabulary and Listenability are the two dimensions keeping it below a Level 9 (CLB 9) response. Swapping general phrases for precise ones ("my lease is ending", "pay toward groceries") and saying each sentence once without restarting would do most to close the gap.
Your advice is thoughtful and well organized; to reach 9, use more precise everyday words and practise saying each sentence once, without restarting.
The task pages give one AI grade a day with no account, shared across Writing and Speaking. Levels are PrepEx practice estimates, not official CELPIP results.
Responses are original PrepEx material written for this guide. Levels are PrepEx practice estimates against CELPIP’s public descriptors. CELPIP says its rating process cannot be reproduced outside the test, so treat them as a guide, not a prediction.
Rules that change a mark: word count, templates, off-topic answers and the timer
Word count
Both Writing tasks ask for about 150–200 words, with a counter on screen. CELPIP allows a little room either side, but a former rater said on CELPIP’s podcast that a response far over or under loses marks even when it’s well written. No cut-off or penalty size is published. By PrepEx’s count, CELPIP’s rated samples at levels 8 to 12 run from about 145 to 200 words. Spend spare minutes revising, not adding.
Memorized and templated answers
CELPIP counts memorizing test answers as cheating and can cancel responses that aren’t original or spontaneous. The former rater said memorized general sentences, usually in openings and closings, are obvious to raters and earn no credit. A plan you fill with new sentences is fine.
Off-topic and incomplete answers
Relevance and completeness count, but gaps don’t automatically sink a response. CELPIP’s rated samples include a Level 9 email that skipped the third bullet and spent a paragraph on the wrong day, an unfinished Level 10 survey response, a Level 10 Task 2 whose first idea wandered off topic, and a Level 8 Task 2 that never chose an option. CELPIP doesn’t say what happens to a response that’s off topic throughout.
Running out of time in Speaking
Only what’s recorded is rated. CELPIP’s samples rated 8, 9 and 12 were cut off mid-idea, so being cut off isn’t fatal. Make the main point early.
Sarcasm, humour and tone
Humour isn’t on the rating scale, and sarcasm or rudeness can make the tone seem dismissive or the content off topic. Invented names and details are fine.
Spell-check
The Writing test has an automatic spell-checker. It won’t catch a correctly spelled wrong word or a slip on the punctuation keys, which the former rater listed among common problems. In Speaking, talk at a normal volume: CELPIP’s study pack says too loud or too quiet affects Listenability.
CELPIP marking myths, checked against the evidence
What people say, and what CELPIP’s own material shows
What people say
What the evidence shows
CELPIP doesn’t use AI.
CELPIP’s FAQ calls its Writing scoring an “AI-human hybrid”, with every Writing score reviewed by its rating team. It doesn’t mention AI for Speaking.
Every dimension counts the same.
CELPIP doesn’t publish how the dimensions or the tasks are weighted. Equal weighting is an assumption.
A good template guarantees a 9.
Memorized general sentences earn no credit, a former rater said, and CELPIP can cancel responses that aren’t original.
Going over 200 words is fine if the writing is good.
There’s a little leeway, but far over or under can cost marks even when the writing is good.
Raters mark your accent.
CELPIP says there’s no accent category in rater training or rubrics. Being understood is what counts.
Being cut off by the timer ruins your score.
CELPIP’s own Speaking samples rated 8, 9 and 12 were cut off mid-idea.
Grammar has its own score.
Grammar is one of four factors inside Readability (Writing) or Listenability (Speaking).
Raters count your mistakes.
They judge the response as a whole. CELPIP’s Level 12 samples still contain small errors.
How to mark CELPIP Writing and Speaking with these criteria
CELPIP says plainly that no one in a classroom is a CELPIP rater, the teacher included, so its process can’t be recreated there. It also advises against asking a class to guess a response’s level. Mark against a target instead, with evidence, and call the result an estimate.
Fix the target first, usually 7 or 9, and ask for each dimension whether the response reaches it.
Read or listen to the whole response first.
Note evidence per dimension: one phrase for a yes, one for a no. Use the factors, not an error count.
At the identical boundaries (Speaking 7/8 and 8/9, Writing Readability 8/9), decide on the dimensions that change.
Keep rule problems in Task Fulfillment. Word count, a missed bullet or an option never chosen shouldn’t also come off Readability.
Report an estimate: yes or no per dimension, or a range such as 8–9, plus one next step. Start with what works.
Mark Speaking from the audio. CELPIP’s raters never use transcripts, and pauses don’t show up on paper.
CELPIP’s post on using sample responses in the classroom adds: use responses at or below your learners’ level (a class around 7 learns most from 5 to 7), set a 7 beside a 9 and have learners name the differences, and use the Performance Standards for peer editing. Never have learners memorize a model answer.
To mark your own Speaking, CELPIP suggests recording a response, transcribing it and using the Performance Standards to find strengths as well as weaknesses.
For CELPIP instructors: training, the Teacher Support Pack and PrepEx
CELPIP offers two free courses for teachers. Both use rated samples to show how responses are marked.
Instructor Training Level 1: a recorded course of about five hours for teachers with at least a year of experience, covering the Writing and Speaking criteria and the Performance Standards. Finish within ten days for a certificate and a PDF Instructor Training Manual. Groups start monthly.
Instructor Training Level 2: about ten hours, self-directed, for teachers with CLB 10 English who have done Level 1. It goes deeper into rating and includes six rated Writing responses, in two sets of three, for class use. The certificate needs full marks on every quiz.
Teacher Support Pack: a free .zip behind a short form (name, email, country). Its landing page lists ideas for using practice tests in class, with schedules for three course formats, printable copies of the two free tests, the Performance Standards, checklists for students in both skills, a vocabulary journal template and classroom activities.
Prep providers can also join the CELPIP Network (co-branding, referral incentives, discounted study materials in bulk). Details are on CELPIP’s instructors page.
What PrepEx gives a CELPIP class
You can invite students one by one or in a batch, assign any of the 20 CELPIP task families with a due date, open each student’s saved answer with PrepEx’s estimate for every dimension, track progress and send PDF reports that parents can read. There are no full CELPIP tests to assign, teachers can’t change PrepEx’s estimates, and teachers can’t play back students’ Speaking recordings. Access is arranged with PrepEx, usually starting with a short complimentary evaluation for the school. Set up PrepEx for your CELPIP class.
CELPIP Writing and Speaking marking sheet
One sheet per response: pick a target level, tick yes or no for each dimension, note your evidence and add one next step.
Marked from the audio, not a transcript (Speaking)
PrepEx practice checks, not CELPIP’s rubric, which isn’t published in full. The result is an estimate, not an official level.
PrepEx marking sheet · prepex.ai/celpip/scoring-criteria · Paraphrased from CELPIP’s public Performance Standards; official material is at celpip.ca. Practice estimates only. Free CELPIP practice test at prepex.ai/celpip-practice-test.
CELPIP scoring criteria: common questions
How is CELPIP writing score calculated?
Four to six raters, working independently, give your two responses a level for every dimension. CELPIP converts those ratings into a level from 0 to 12, and a benchmark rater steps in if they disagree. Its FAQ adds that Writing scoring is an “AI-human hybrid” checked by raters.
Is CELPIP writing checked by AI?
Partly. CELPIP’s FAQ calls its Writing scoring an “AI-human hybrid”, with the rating team reviewing and verifying every Writing score. It doesn’t say how the work is split or when the system started, and it says nothing about AI in Speaking.
How to score 9 in CELPIP writing?
Answer every part and, in Task 2, choose an option. State your purpose early, back each idea with a specific detail, paragraph clearly, choose accurate words, suit the tone to the reader and stay near 150–200 words. In CELPIP’s study pack, organization and task completion held back a Level 8 response whose grammar was already strong.
How to score 9 in CELPIP speaking?
Answer directly, give reasons with real detail, use precise words, keep going without long pauses and pitch your tone to the listener. Grammar and fluency are worded the same at 8 and 9, so vocabulary, tone and development usually decide it.
How is the CELPIP test marked?
Listening and Reading are multiple choice and scored by computer. Writing and Speaking are rated on four dimensions by several raters. Each skill gets its own level from 0 to 12, and levels 3 to 12 equal the same CLB level.
How is CELPIP speaking score calculated?
Three to five raters rate each of your eight responses on all four dimensions, and your level comes from all eight. CELPIP says there are many ways to reach a level, so one weak task won’t decide it.
How to become a CELPIP instructor?
Start with CELPIP’s free Instructor Training: Level 1 (about five hours) and Level 2 (about ten hours), each with a certificate. Rating is a separate job. CELPIP raters need native-speaker English or CLB 11–12, a degree, TESL Canada-recognized certification or graduate training, three years of ESL or related experience, and residence in Canada.
Can I use a template for CELPIP?
Not a sentence template. Memorizing answers counts as cheating, non-original responses can be cancelled, and memorized general lines earn no credit. A plan you fill with fresh sentences is fine.
Does CELPIP check grammar?
Yes, as one of four factors in Readability or Listenability, not as a separate score. Raters don’t count errors; what matters is whether errors get in the way and how wide a range of structures you control.
What are the CELPIP Performance Standards?
CELPIP’s public list of the four dimensions for each skill, with their factors and a guiding question for each. CELPIP describes it as a cut-down version of the raters’ scale; the full rubric isn’t published.
Use the criteria on a real answer
PREPARING FOR CELPIP
Take the free practice test and see estimated levels on the same dimensions, with your own words quoted back and the next thing to fix.
PrepEx checked these CELPIP pages and documents on November 13, 2026. The descriptors on this page are PrepEx’s paraphrase; open the official material for CELPIP’s exact wording. CELPIP is a Prometric test. PrepEx is independent and not affiliated with CELPIP or Prometric.