Academic Discussion Mastery
Write a clear position, engage with other viewpoints, and add one useful idea to the discussion.
Part 1: What This Task Really Checks
Academic Discussion stays in TOEFL 2026. The task is simple: read the professor's prompt, read two student replies, then add your own response. Strong answers do three things: take a position, connect to the discussion, and add a concrete reason or example.
High scoring answers are not about sounding fancy.
They are about making a clear argument in limited time. If your response is direct, relevant, and logically organized, you can score well without complex vocabulary.
What to do
- State your position early
- Reference at least one student response
- Add one fresh reason or example
- Stay focused on the professor's question
What to avoid
- Repeating student A or B without new content
- Giving examples that do not match the topic
- Writing a generic paragraph you memorized
- Ignoring the discussion context
Part 2: Task Flow in 4 Steps
Read the professor's question first
Identify exactly what decision or opinion you need to address.
Scan student A and B for their core claim
You do not need to summarize everything. Pull one key point from each.
Choose your position and one supporting reason
Plan one example from campus life, class experience, or a simple real-world case.
Write a complete, focused response and proofread quickly
Keep sentence structure clean. Fix obvious grammar errors before you submit.
Part 3: Scoring Focus
Content and relevance
Your response must answer the prompt directly and include a logical reason.
Engagement with discussion
Show you read the student comments. Agree, disagree, or qualify one point.
Organization
Keep a clear flow: position, reason, support, closing line.
Language control
Use accurate grammar and appropriate academic tone. Avoid text-message style.
What a 5 usually looks like
- Clear stance in the first 1-2 sentences
- Specific support, not generic statements
- At least one explicit connection to student A or B
- Controlled grammar with only minor errors
Part 4: Reliable Response Framework
Use this framework when time is tight.
I agree with [Student A/B] that [claim], but I would add that [your angle].
Line 3-5: Main reason
My main reason is [reason]. In many classes, [short example].
Line 6-8: Additional support
Another point is [second support], which can improve [outcome].
Final line: concise close
For these reasons, [restate position in one sentence].
Part 5: Full Example
Professor prompt:
Should universities require one community service course for all students before graduation?
Student A
Yes. Community service teaches teamwork and responsibility. It also helps students understand local needs.
Student B
No. Requirements can become a burden for students with jobs and family responsibilities.
Sample response:
I agree with Student A that community service can build practical skills, but Student B is right about time pressure. A better policy is to require service with flexible options. For example, students could choose weekend events, remote tutoring, or short project-based service connected to their major. This keeps the educational benefit while respecting different schedules. In my own program, students who joined local tutoring projects reported better communication skills and stronger resumes. If universities allow flexible formats, most students can participate without harming their academic performance. For these reasons, community service should be required, but the format should stay flexible.
Part 6: Frequent Mistakes and Fixes
Mistake: "I agree with Student A" and stop there.
Fix: Add one reason and one specific example.
Mistake: Ignore student comments completely.
Fix: Include at least one phrase like "I agree with..." or "I would challenge...".
Mistake: Off-topic paragraph.
Fix: Reuse key nouns from the prompt in your topic sentence.
Mistake: Extremely short or unfocused responses.
Fix: Write enough to give a position, support it, and connect to the discussion.
Part 7: 1-Week Practice Plan
Days 1-2: Structure only
Write 2 responses per day using the framework. Ignore style. Focus on clear logic.
Days 3-4: Add engagement quality
Practice meaningful references to student responses. Avoid copy-paste phrasing.
Days 5-6: Timed sets
Run 3 prompts in a row at 10 minutes each. Review grammar and clarity after each set.
Day 7: Full writing sequence
Do Build a Sentence, Email, and Academic Discussion back-to-back to build section stamina.
Practice Academic Discussion
Focus on clear position, discussion engagement, and concise support.
Start Academic Discussion Practice